Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Jordan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;   &spades;  17:37, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Craig Jordan
Possible vanity or advertising. Unfortunately, it asserts notability. He has an IMDb profile showing that he played a zombie in one horror movie. Erik the Rude 01:35, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete / Delete. The IMDb link merely shows that he was an extra in some movie. It's hardly a sign of notability. Seems like a clear case of vanity. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 01:37, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Zombies deleted my prom date NawlinWiki 01:42, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Not notable. DarthVad e r 02:00, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Last Rites of the Deleted Trailer. ~ trialsanderrors 02:14, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Do Not Delete: I have seen one of the movies that Craig Jordan is in and it is a solid B-movie spectacular. Way better than calculus. Myrand4 10:20, 10 June 2006 (UTC)'''
 * Sign your comments with ~ at the end of them. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 02:31,
 * User has four edits, two on this afd and 2 on the afds talk page. Also the user account was made on 02:10, 11 June 2006. Likely sock.-- Andeh 16:03, 11 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete before it eats my brains. Agent 86 02:48, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Adambiswanger1 03:38, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. It sounds like a mix of a vanity site, resume and some gentle ribbing by his friends. None of this makes for notability. Interlingua 03:43, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I like how the editor assumes that the fact that the actor studied Stanislavski is somehow notable. They even added a link to "Stonislavsky"'s bio. Dancter 03:56, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, vanity and fails WP:BIO. --Coredesat 04:01, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete if a lingering one. Fails WP:BIO but at least attempts to assert notability. —C.Fred (talk) 05:36, 11 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Do Not Delete - Craig Jordan is a very talented actor, and has a promising future. I have seen many of his plays in New York, and can personally attest to his wonderful musical and terpsichorean abilities. - --Ref32278 06:13, 11 June 2006(UTC)
 * User has 5 edits, 4 on this AFD and 1 on the articles talk page. The user account was created on 06:03, 11 June 2006 Ref32278. Likely sock.-- Andeh 16:06, 11 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Do Delete per the voices in my head --- Zombie who is pretending to be --- CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 08:11, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Do Not Delete: This entry simply summarizes the accomplishments of a young actor to date. There are currently many entries on Wikipedia that are less deserving than this.--Palguy 14:26, 11 June 2006 (UTC)'''
 * User has 6 edits all on this AFD, account was created on 14:25, 11 June 2006. Likely sock.-- Andeh 16:10, 11 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete vanity, hoax, everything not for WP — M e ts 501 (talk) 15:26, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per nom and — M e ts 501 .-- Andeh 16:07, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Everyone has voted Delete or Speedy delete apart from the likely sockpuppets.-- Andeh 16:12, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy zombified delete as vanity. Mr. L e fty Talk to me! 16:15, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete It reads like a badly written resume and appears to represent the little work of a "budding" actor, so fails WP:BIO... Non notable actor in non-notable parts of non-notable movies. doktorb | words 18:30, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- getcrunk   juice  contribs 18:43, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete for reasons stated above. Doesn't meet WP:BIO. DVD+ R/W 00:37, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per above. &mdash; Khoikhoi 00:59, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - very notable! Just kidding, delete.  Sorry, this one was just such an obvious delete that i got bored.  ENpeeOHvee 03:49, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. No birth year given? Dubious. -- Omicronpersei8 02:33, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * '''Do not delete. i thought everyone here would be mad judicious.  --alm8319 10:57, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Sockpuppet. New user, only edits are to this article. Similiar to the others, this one doesn't seem to know how to sign with ~ . -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 04:19, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Do No Delete: Unlikely sock puppets - It may be that those who can attest to Craig Jordan's notability have better things to do than edit Wikipedia articles. Judging by the quality of arguments made, the "Do Not Deletes" win hands down.  I would trust the opinion of someone who has edited only a handful of articles over someone who has edited thousands (a person who clearly has lost touch of reality).TeddDD 21:40, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. Now it's getting too far. I'm going to put these puppets on the admin notice board. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 01:16, 16 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.