Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Keeland


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 23:06, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Craig Keeland

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Revised several times, but remains promotional and of borderline notability  DGG ( talk ) 01:57, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Certainly not notable enough and stinks of being a vanity article written by himself or an associate. --Cantivsto (talk) 02:08, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't seem to contain any significant coverage of the individual in any of the references I could look through WP:GNG TomKoenig (talk) 03:27, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'm from the DFW area (born and raised) and have never heard of any of his companies. Google News searches provide mostly local news coverage, of course, but even then they're not in-depth about anything he does to make it notable. Searches for the three companies listed show pretty much the same results. The article is very detailed but the problem is that it's too promotional. Even when the article started, it was pretty much the same. Nothing actually in-depth. SwisterTwister   talk  06:02, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep I posted the original article. After it was nominated for deletion, I did some research, scrapped the article, and rewrote it. I hope it meets Wikipedia standards for notability and complies with all other guidelines. If it does not, I'm very willing to learn how to make it better, and I thank you for your patience. Thanks, HtownCat (talk) 01:21, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:35, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:35, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:35, 6 November 2013 (UTC)


 * HtownCat asked me to revisit this. It is somewhat improved, but I continue to think there is no substantial notability. There might possibly be a place for an article on the company.  DGG ( talk ) 03:21, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.