Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Keilitz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. L Faraone  22:33, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Craig Keilitz

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable individual, only referenced from primary sources. Σ Α Π Φ (Sapph) Talk 18:42, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 12 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete. Not sure what the litmus test for athletic directors is, but my gut feeling is that the man is just not sufficiently notable. --Legis (talk - contribs) 01:14, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 01:09, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Delete Does not pass WP:BIO. And Adoil Descended (talk) 02:26, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. I couldn't find the entry for gut feelings in our guidelines, nor did I see how BIO isn't passed. We don't have guidelines for ADs, so we can go by the normal policy: GNG. I just added some references to the article, of which this is probably the strongest. Drmies (talk) 02:05, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 15:43, 27 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - The sources Drmies provided do establish notability. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 17:53, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I didn't want to close it; I think it was a close one when I saw it, and it still is, though now on the keep side. Thanks for weighing in. Drmies (talk) 19:15, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.