Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Mason


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete no reliable secondary sources to establish notability. None of the keep opinions have provided any policy based argument for keeping the article. Davewild (talk) 15:08, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Craig Mason

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsuccessful candidate in an election. I looked on his campaign Website for any other claims he might have to notability--came up with zippo. Blueboy96 14:12, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with nom. Paste (talk) 14:42, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  15:46, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  15:46, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep this article has no proof of vandalism, and has helped contribute to Wikipedia, but more information on it is needed but keep it.Mertozoro (talk) 23:12, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable Fritzpoll (talk) 23:24, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Could use more expanding but should be kept.76.67.93.126 (talk) 19:38, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Good article, shouldn't be deleted!!!!!!!Wikipowerman (talk) 19:40, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Are we to take Wikipowerman's comment seriously? Paste (talk) 19:49, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Even if this article is very short, it should be kept, if expanded it could provide lots of useful inforamtion.!!!76.67.93.126 (talk) 22:14, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Second vote by this IP Fritzpoll (talk) 16:15, 21 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Unless shown to be notable. Simply being a candidate twice doesn't meet the notability criteria - see WP:BIO.  --Tim4christ17 talk 14:06, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Come on, we don't need to shoot this article down, if we expand it a little it will be a good article, so we should keep it!!Futuramadude (talk) 16:47, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, then - what are the further claims to notability? The AfD isn't focused on length, but on whether Mr. Mason is notable.  Also, note that Wikipedia is not a democracy - the administrator who will close the debate will be looking for reasons why it should not be deleted, not simply more "votes".  --Tim4christ17 talk 17:09, 21 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.