Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Schley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  Sandstein  20:44, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Craig Schley

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Nonnotable third-party Congressional candidate; no other notability shown. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:33, 16 October 2008 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:39, 21 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:47, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:47, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   kur  ykh   02:14, 26 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Communist or no, third party candidate or no, he has coverage in independent reliable sources and passes WP:PEOPLE. GoogleGoogle News  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 03:18, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete The "City Room" of the New York Times is local news, and they report he got 6000 signatures in his district of New York City, which is not a notable accomplishment. Not everyone who gets on a ballot is notable. Potatoswatter (talk) 08:21, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep I have to agree with Schmidt, meets WP:N in that the coverage is non-trivial. As far as I'm concerned, this is an utterly unimportant subject, the existence of which I would have been happily unaware if it was not for this debate, and will continue to never want to read the article after the debate is closed.  But notability has been established so its got to be a keep.  Sp in ni  ng  Spark  19:50, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable Local third party candidate. Coverage is only in the context of a local race. RayAYang (talk) 20:08, 26 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.