Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Tara


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete both. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:48, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Craig Tara

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete nn holiday campsite, only source is from its owner - nothing to show significant coverage in third party reliable sources, fails WP:N Carlossuarez46 20:40, 30 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I am also nominating:
 * another campsite owned by the same company with similar lack of references or notability.

Carlossuarez46 20:42, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

'Tip to nominator: Consider using the proposed deletion process for uncontroversial deletions, such as this one. Thanks!' -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:48, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of sources and, thus, Verifiability. Additional coverage in independent sources would satisfy these requirements, and preserve the article. I am also concerned about Conflict of Interest. ZZ Claims~ Evidence 13:12, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:N. Doctorfluffy 21:21, 2 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.