Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Thomson (boxer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:18, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Craig Thomson (boxer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not enough to pass WP:NBOX and very questionably passes WP:GNG. The sources listed are local newspapers and BoxRec, and the creator is a representative for the NZ Boxing Federation who has created article of questionable notability in the past, most of which have been deleted. I think we should take a look at this article, too. JTtheOG (talk) 04:24, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. JTtheOG (talk) 04:32, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 10:18, 28 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete No enough to meet either WP:NBOX or WP:GNG.Peter Rehse (talk) 14:22, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 29 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails NBOX, as have many others previously created by the same user who is continuing to create more of the same. DerbyCountyinNZ  (Talk Contribs) 03:04, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Almost every source in the article links to Boxrec and that's not significant or reliable coverage. Notability is not inherited from who he trains. Mdtemp (talk) 08:17, 31 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.