Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Walendziak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 09:08, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Craig Walendziak

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article this is a MAJOR coi, see also Articles for deletion/Living Hell (band) and Articles for deletion/Follow Through (Band) Wgolf (talk) 23:41, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Wgolf I think you are getting carried away. This is a very factual article. Sourced by like 100 articles. This seems personal for some reason? 76.119.12.233 (talk)
 * Most of the sources don't seem reliable. Everymorning   talk  23:49, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Deadline? Story magazine? Famous Monsters of Filmland? Revelation Records? Paige Screenwriting Award? All of these articles are online or in print and have their own wikipeida pages. He has movie coming out. I'm having trouble seeing the ill intent here. 76.119.12.233 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 23:53, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent)|lambast 00:18, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent)|lambast 00:18, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent)|lambast 00:18, 31 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete has some presence in the horror film genre, fails WP:FILMMAKER. Geogene (talk) 01:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. I created the band pages. It had nothing to do with this original article. I just wanted to put up the bands mentioned. Pulled the info from here. Sorry for the confusion. Dilbert Grapes (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 02:26, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * User has been indeffed for sockpuppetry. Sockpuppet investigations/Craig mack378 Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:23, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep Has actual 3rd party references to works & write ups linked. — Preceding unsigned comment added by IamM1rv (talk • contribs) 14:55, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:37, 7 April 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:28, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Clearly meets all requirements for WP:FILMMAKER. COI was irrelevant to article. Band pages were already deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.161.14.35 (talk • contribs)  Continued abuse of multiple accounts to sway concensus per Sockpuppet investigations/Craig mack378.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  20:10, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note to closing admin: This IP was used by Craig mack378 as part of his sockpuppetry campaign. That account was blocked for 1 week, as was the IP. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:48, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

*Keep Wow. I just signed on after like a month. I'm not sure what is going on. Sock puppetry? I didn't even create this article! I added the picture. Ill take it down if that makes the crusaders happy? This easily meets all the guidelines for WP:FILMMAKER. I added the picture for completion sake. There is no way that this article should be 'objectively removed'. This whole thing is bizarre to me. This shouldn't even be up for discussion? Let alone RE-LISTED two times. Craig mack378 (talk) Striking !vote - confirmed use of multiple accounts.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  04:58, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Did you happen to sign on because this AfD page was protected today and this was the only way you could comment here again? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:56, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * No, because I would have signed in a month ago? I also would have commented the first time it was posted? There is no vast conspiracy here. This is why people don't contribute to wiki. Craig mack378 (talk)
 * Nobody's made any accusations of conspiracy, only sockpuppetry, which is the opposite of a conspiracy. Meatpuppetry would be a conspiracy, but I don't think "vast" is the right adjective here. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:43, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Understood. I don't know who created the article. I know Dilbert. This has been cleared up in the last COI discussion. But, besides all this... this article is accurate and impartial. I will delete the photo I added if you want. Sorry about that. Craig mack378 (talk) 03:02, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I'd probably stop mentioning the photo if I were you. Nobody's said anything about a photo and the photo isn't the central point of discussion. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:03, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.