Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig svonkin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tawker (talk) 06:58, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Craig svonkin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't appear to meet notability guidelines generally and for academics specifically. Assumed good faith by not requesting speedy deletion, but the article's creator appears to be interested primarily in maintaining the entry so as to add nonsense. JNW (talk) 19:59, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  20:38, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, GS h-index of 2, fails WP:PROF. Jinkinson   talk to me  20:39, 31 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete as above. This is no exception to the rule that Assistant Professors are rarely notable. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:45, 31 March 2014 (UTC).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:57, 31 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete Waste of time. Clear A7. --Randykitty (talk) 08:05, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Assistant professors are usually too early in their career to pass WP:PROF and I see no sign that this case is an exception. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:19, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.