Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cralosophus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 15:03, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Cralosophus

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Possible hoax? I can't find anything about this animal and "Cralosophus jackforsteriensis" returns zero results across every search engine that I have tried. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:56, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:56, 7 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - taxonomy isn't a specialty of mine, but I can find no references which support this. If valid refs can be shown, then ping me.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:09, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete unless anyone finds something to support this. Mccapra (talk) 14:54, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete -- certainly has hoax vibes. If it's real, it's a member of an inherently notable category, but neither my nor the nominator's search can find anything for that. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 15:41, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete the lack of citations doesn't help. Oaktree b (talk) 19:28, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete in absence of sources or any record of a description. Can't quite figure out what the author is up to - on the one hand, valid articles on newly described species - on the other hand, random addition of 2021 "synonyms" for common species ... -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 14:49, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:11, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. Unverifiable, and "jackforsteriensis" is suspect.-- Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 15:17, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lol, it does seem to be a hoax. do you have anything to say about it? Tercer (talk) 20:01, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as others have said. -Kj cheetham (talk) 20:13, 13 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.