Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cranbourne Business and Enterprise College


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:19, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Cranbourne Business and Enterprise College

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Unbalanced, unsourced article that has three references for the whole thing. Seems to have some very odd claims with no sources. Badly written and biased. User Talk:W.D. 20:24, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 21:12, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 21:12, 27 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - pretty notable high school as far as I can see; plenty of sources to meet WP:GNG available. Nothing in the nomination that can't be fixed by editing. TerriersFan (talk) 00:23, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Consensus is that all verified secondary schools are notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:03, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep – Per Notability (high schools). Northamerica1000(talk) 15:50, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
 * ...which is opinion, not policy. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 18:32, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
 * ...which is perfectly acceptable in AfD discussions! -- Necrothesp (talk) 19:52, 29 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - This nomination is an excellent example of WP:RUBBISH. The subject is notable, the article may need some work, but that's no reason to delete what's there. waggers (talk) 09:03, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep -- This is a high school and the consensus is that we allow an article on all of them. The article may be a bad one, but that points to tagging for imnprovement, not deletion.  Peterkingiron (talk) 21:35, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.