Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crap commercialism

Crap commercialism was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE

Neologism - SimonP 00:36, Oct 10, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: You'd never figure out what it meant without this article, I'm sure.  Sheesh.  "Doo-doo head imperialism is an even worse insult to imperialism."  Gorsh.  Geogre 04:09, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * If this gets deleted, Crass commercialism must go as well. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk)]] 17:13, Oct 10, 2004 (UTC)
 * Why? Crass commercialism gets a hundred times the hits of crap commercialism. - SimonP 20:45, Oct 10, 2004 (UTC)
 * Guess it was just a parody then. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk)]] 15:10, Oct 11, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree that crass commercialism should go too. Andrewa 18:36, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Pointless. Gamaliel 18:23, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Inherently POV, even though it agrees with my POV :) --Improv 01:13, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. POV neologism. jni 05:12, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Someone's merged it into Crass commercialism anyway. Maycontainpeanuts 14:15, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Comment: It's been in both places for more than a year. Better late than never. No change of vote. Andrewa 18:36, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * D Especially since nothing links to it apart from these votes. *whistles innocently* Chris 02:46, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.