Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crapflooding


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Internet Relay Chat flood. –Juliancolton Happy Holidays 01:08, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Crapflooding

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Dicdef, unreferenced. No hope of expansion. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 21:57, 7 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge with spam. Crapflooding is recognized as a precursor to spam, and - as far as I can tell - remains a relevant term. Graymornings (talk) 22:04, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - I think that this article could turn into something. However, I'd like to see it sourced. - Richard Cavell (talk) 22:06, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 * O RLY? I don't see any sources anywhere. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 13:25, 8 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 05:44, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:25, 12 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment: Does it pass WP:NEO? WP:N? It might be better merged with spam, or an article on web lingo. &eta;oian   &Dagger;orever &eta;ew &Dagger;rontiers  07:53, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Internet Relay Chat flood where this term all ready is listed. Nothing really to merge, and on its own it is basically a dicdef, and lacks notability for a stand alone article. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  14:14, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Xymmax unless the article can be sourced and expanded to avoid WP:NEO and WP:DICDEF --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:29, 17 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.