Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crash! Boom! Bang! World Tour 1994/95


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect all to appropriate sections of Roxette.-- Aervanath (talk) 22:10, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Crash! Boom! Bang! World Tour 1994/95
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable Roxette tours that consist mainly of an indiscriminate list of tour dates and/or a setlist. Totally fails to satisfy the general notability guideline with significant coverage in reliable, third-party, sources. The only source is Roxette's own webpage of tour info, which maybe OK for the fans, but not for Wikipedia.

I am also nominating the following related pages:

For those of you not smelling of socks, you may want to drop by here too; WP:AfD/Room Service Tour (2nd nomination).  Esradekan Gibb   "Talk" 11:40, 22 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  --  J mundo 13:13, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:11, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as a list of non-encyclopedic tour dates. Tavix | Talk  00:24, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - Roxette were huge in Europe in the mid-90s (lots Top10 hits in about every European country and selling more than 70 million singles and albums), so I doubt all of their tours at the time of their peak (Joyride and Crash! Boom! Bang!) are non-notable fancruft. There certainly was tons of coverage in mags like BRAVO. I propose Roxette tours or something similiar. -- Avant-garde a clue - hexa Chord 2  18:35, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to a new Roxette tours article. Agreed they were hugely popular, so if there are not enough sources for individual notibility, there should be in aggregate.YobMod 10:00, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
 * comment (leaning on delete) Most likely anything worth keeping is already at the main article - Roxette and Roxette - I guess only the references are worth keeping and I have added them to the main artcle - Nabla (talk) 19:09, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of reliable third-party sources, and general lack of notability. -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 22:56, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the appropriate sections (pointed out above) in the main Roxette article. yandman  10:12, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.