Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crash Dummy vs The Evil D-Troit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to CID The Dummy. Anything relevant can be merged from the history. Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:40, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Crash Dummy vs The Evil D-Troit

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Another 11 year old unsourced....well not even a stub, it is a two sentence article. Nothing to be found in reviews, no Metacritic page, nothing. Fails WP:GNG. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 20:47, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:55, 30 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Merge to CID The Dummy if there's anything usable. This was a working title for that game. Reach Out to the Truth 14:48, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment Problem is that there is nothing to be merged here as it's a one sentenced unsourced article. At best this should be deleted and then redirected to it with just adding that it was formerly called as Crash Dummy vs The Evil D-Troit. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 18:10, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If there's nothing to merge, then a merge result is effectively a redirect. This is why I ultimately chose merge over redirect, which was actually my first choice. I did end up copying some appropriate categories to the Cid article. The second sentence has no equivalent in the target article and could also potentially be merged. I'm not a fan of "delete and redirect" as an AFD result in general, and particularly here. That's for separate but related topics that are not themselves notable. This is the same topic. Reach Out to the Truth 17:26, 6 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Redirect to CID The Dummy If this is in fact just the working title of CID The Dummy (which seems to be the case), then we should just redirect. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 15:33, 7 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.