Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crass commercialism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. WjBscribe 22:20, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Crass commercialism

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The negative connotations of commercialism are already covered at that title. This title is inherently POV. Alksub 04:19, 9 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. WP is not a place for adverbial phrases (although I do agree with the articles sentiment). -- Alan Liefting talk 04:24, 9 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete It's unsourced and not only is the title POV, its the whole article. Besides that, the see also section is just a listing of things a few editors think are worthless. Ageofe 04:26, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a soapbox and inclusion in this category would be 100% POV and original research. Plus, no sources. Accounting4Taste 05:46, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neologism. Keb25 13:14, 9 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. wp:pov, wp:crap. Mystache 14:02, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete This is actually someone's list of what they consider to be crass commercialism (9/11 TV Specials, Emo Bands, Fast Food, Hollywood, MTV, Nu Metal, Pop music, Sprite Remix). It's a holdover from 2002, when Wikipedia was so hard up it would keep ANYTHING.  Mandsford 15:47, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.