Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crazeclown


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 02:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Crazeclown

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

this article was speedy deleted with the name Emmanuel Iwueke 'Dr Craze. It fails WP:GNG as nothing establishes notability. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 15:25, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 15:25, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 15:26, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 15:26, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Delete fails notability Cotton2 (talk) 10:40, 2 September 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:14, 7 September 2016 (UTC) keep doesnt fail notabilty, sources are verifiable and independent of the subject.Kelvinsage1 (talk) 11:55, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * , can you provide 5 independent sources to back your vote? I doubt. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 13:39, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

I want to ask too, that, is it the number of sources that matter, or the quality of those sources? besides, i believe you know who crazeclown is, his nationwide coverage and star status as well as his international coverage makes him a notable person.Kelvinsage1 (talk) 16:19, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete The coverage is almost exclusively on blogs (WP:SPS) or social media. There is literally nothing in the way of reliable independent sources. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 02:40, 13 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.