Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crazy, Sick and Cracked


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was a preemptive deletion. --  Denelson83  07:10, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Crazy, Sick and Cracked

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Disambiguation page for three related magazines. Nothing links to it (except the list of Disambig pages), and I doubt anyone would ever type in this phrase to find any of individual magazines. Flyguy649talkcontribs 00:21, 10 April 2007 (UTC) ]] 16:30, 10 April 2007 (UTC) talk with me·changes
 * Delete; Useless. And why isn't it Crazy, Sick, Cracked, and MAD? Pufnstuf 00:27, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, quite a pointless disambig. --Cremepuff222  ( talk,  review me! ) 00:43, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Cause of useless disambig. Daniel5127 | Talk 04:19, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Thewinchester (talk) 07:07, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 07:44, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom., this is pointless. Nihiltres 12:40, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep, because I recall seeing Cracked frequently in stores growing up. --Wikipedian, Historian, and Friend? 16:13, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete User:Wikipedian, Historian, and Friend?, please read the nomination fully before you vote, as you must be confused. There is already an article for each of these.  The nomiation is to delete the disambig page.  It really doesn't need to be there.  [[User:Sumnjim| J A M D A W G 
 * just opined "strong keep" in 27 AFD discussions over a period of 35 minutes, several times with clearly disruptive rationales. Uncle G 16:48, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per the nominator. Acalamari 17:20, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. What is there to disambiguate?  They're three different magazine titles.  -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 20:36, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --ElKevbo 21:17, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - I'm going to post a CSD G6 here. It's not a disambig page that only points to one item, it's a disambig page that, per consensus here, attempts to disambiguate something that isn't even ambiguous to begin with. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 19:37, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.