Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crazy Blind Date


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. JForget 13:28, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Crazy Blind Date

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Another unremarkable on-line dating site. Not exactly a new idea or a ground-breaking service. I feel it fails all Wikipedia inclusion criteria. Trevor Marron (talk) 11:05, 3 August 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ascidian  | talk-to-me  16:05, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Relisting comment. Twinkle only completed part II of the nomination process. I have completed it. ascidian  | talk-to-me  16:05, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- - 2/0 (cont.) 16:35, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- - 2/0 (cont.) 16:37, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:WEB. See this article from ABC, this article from the Boston Globe, this article from Columbia News Service, and this article from Xconomy. Notability is fully established. I added these references to the article in July 2009, after the article was tagged for speedy deletion, so I don't understand why the nominator brought this article to AfD in August. Cunard (talk) 22:08, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. It hardly set the world on fire, but it got significant coverage in multiple reliable source, thus it is notable. Fences  &amp;  Windows  23:40, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.