Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crazy Gang (comics)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:40, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Crazy Gang (comics)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

One reference on one page in a book is not enough to satisfy WP:GNG. Killer Moff- ill advisedly sticking his nose in since 2011 (talk) 12:33, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Killer Moff- ill advisedly sticking his nose in since 2011 (talk) 12:33, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Killer Moff- ill advisedly sticking his nose in since 2011 (talk) 12:33, 3 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Why am I not surprised that Andrew D. is short-circuiting the PROD process for all fictional characters and forcing them to clog up AfD for no reason? In any case, an obvious GNG fail with only WP:PRIMARY and no WP:SECONDARY sources to speak of. The single-sentence citation added by Andrew D. is not nearly enough to prove the article is notable.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 12:57, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I do not think it is appropriate to include commentary about a fellow editor in an AfD discussion. Ford MF (talk) 20:20, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - not independently notable, nor notable within the fiction. It's namedropped by a few of its bluelinked members, but they all provide enough information inline, so no vital information is being lost. I considered a redirect to Mad Jim Jaspers, but that character is equally non-notable and should be deleted as well. Argento Surfer (talk) 13:34, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Following up given the new sources added today. Considering they only verify the creator credits and the painfully obvious reference to Alice in Wonderland, I don't think there's any in-depth coverage to be had. Argento Surfer (talk) 20:32, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep based on sources added to the article today; failing that, merge to List of Marvel Comics teams and organizations. BOZ (talk) 18:50, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per Zxcvbnm and Argento Surfer. I agree with Argento Surfer that the additional sources do not prove in-depth coverage so notability has not been established/proven. Aoba47 (talk) 17:57, 5 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.