Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crazy Meese


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:11, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

Crazy Meese
Hoax. Googling "'Crazy Meese' 'Jake Arnott'", "'Crazy Meese' 'Little White Man'", etc show nothing. Attention drawn to this article via link in Bellamy by possible vandal.

195.92.168.165 22:51, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Why should I delete thee? Let me count the reasons ... WP:V, WP:NMG... -- howcheng  [ talk &#149; contribs &#149; web ] 23:12, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

I don't think this page should be deleted. It is maybe not completely true but people can see that and its fun and amusing. Maybe people who dont like it could just censor the bits they dont like. (Unsigned comment from same IP that created original article, User:195.93.21.70)


 * (Disclaimer: I'm the person who originally put this in AfD). I don't think it's at all true, personally :) Liking it or not is irrelevant; it's not appropriate for Wikipedia. Even if rewritten to be more obviously humorous, it still wouldn't be suitable. We could have a long debate about why "humour" articles on Wikipedia are a bad idea, but that's probably already been done countless times before. 195.92.168.176 16:31, 29 October 2005 (UTC)


 * (Disclaimer: I'm the person who originally put this on Wikipedia). The material in the article is all true, if a little (and occasionally a lot) exaggerated : ) However, having read the sections on verifiability, in particular parts addressing original research, as well as notability and music guidelines, I think perhaps this should be taken off of Wikipedia. I will keep it in my own files at home until such a time as the Crazy Meese meet the guidelines and have some verifiability. Fans, just a few more short years to wait if all goes well!


 * delete as per Howcheng, note: article also include egregious (mis)use of "utilize", be gone! Pete.Hurd 22:19, 2 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.