Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crazy as Hell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:40, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Crazy as Hell

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No sources, fails WP:NFILM. All plot as well, no encyclopedic value. Kirbanzo (talk) 23:50, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  —AE  ( talk  •  contributions ) 01:40, 8 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep. A search brought up multiple reviews from places like the New York Times, Variety, TV Guide, and AV Club, enough to have it pass NFILM. ReaderofthePack (｡◕‿◕｡)  01:57, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:45, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:45, 8 September 2018 (UTC)


 *  Keep as Rotten Tomatoes links to 14 professional film critic reviews in reliable sources such as the New York Times, Variety, Los Angeles Times, New York Post, Village Voice, LA Weekly and many others so it definitely passes both WP:NFILM and WP:GNG, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 18:47, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep – Article has been expanded, it has encyclopedic value, and the film passes WP:NFP. Source examples include:, , , , etc. North America1000 01:53, 14 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.