Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crazy for God


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 22:09, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Crazy for God

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Tag for notability removed. A use of a phrase in a source doesn't make it notable in its own. Anyone who believes finding X sources who can utter a particular phrase can make it notable has far more clarity than the rest of the wiki community who stopped relying on things like google hits a long time ago. The phrase itself hasn't seem to have received any significant coverage and half a dozen people writing it down doesn't garner it an article. WP:NOTE doesn't have anything specific for phrases, but I don't see any significant coverage of the term (e.g. analysis, discussion of history, usage, etc) that is being done by 3rd parties on this term. Crossmr (talk) 11:27, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article is basically a list of instances the phrase was used. It does nothing to explain why it deserves to have an article. - Mgm|(talk) 12:26, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems like original research or synthesis or something. Maybe the article creator can better explain why this is an article and improve the article to reveal its purpose? ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:27, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  coccyx bloccyx  (toccyx)  22:02, 18 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.