Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crealism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 10:52, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Crealism

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Article, by its founder Luis de Miranda, about a new "philosophical, artistical, political and existential movement". Text is a copy, with permission, of its website. The references are: a French Wikipedia article on de Miranda, also written by him; his publisher's website; two articles by him (about Facebook, and not mentioning Crealism). There is no indication, and I have found none by searching, of the substantial independent comment about this movement that would be necessary to establish notability, though there is another "Crealism" website about a new "paradigm in Philosophy, Anthropology, Art" by Momir Nikic, who also claims to have coined the term. I am not clear whether these are two movements or one, but neither seems notable. Note that there are many Books hits, but all seem to be mis-scannings such as this. JohnCD (talk) 10:14, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions.  —JohnCD (talk) 10:17, 27 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete another self-published load of philosophical musings. Completely fails WP:RS, WP:N and probably WP:lots of other things. Totnesmartin (talk) 12:59, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Creal is the real name of Life : the vital fluxus in its ever creative becoming. Crealism is the cult of Life as Creal, and the loving respect of the differences that want to emerge to existence. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:36, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete self-published, even less coherent than most WP:MADEUP things, no evidence of notability (evidence that anybody else took it seriously might be a good start) bobrayner (talk) 19:29, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as per everyone. Edward321 (talk) 23:55, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable vanity page. Roscelese (talk) 21:55, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.