Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cream (software) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  14:55, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Cream (software)
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NSOFT, because there are no independent reliable sources to support notability. It's just a configuration of the Vim (text editor), definitely doesn't deserve a standalone article. Yeah, it's not even a software, merely settings for another text editor.  Delta  space 42 (talk • contribs) 15:43, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  Delta  space 42  (talk • contribs) 15:43, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment. I've just noticed it was nominated before (in 2007, 16 years ago). I'm completely dissatisfied with how it went (keep - info useful, keep - informative, keep - per someone). Definitely worth it to discuss again.  Delta  space 42 (talk • contribs) 15:48, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * OK, now I'm just confused. I've definitely checked for previous deletions in the history before nominating, and after I nominated I saw the previous AfD, just thought I missed it in the history. Looked again - nothing, probably this article indeed was deleted before, but someone reintroduced it.  Delta  space 42 (talk • contribs) 15:52, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * No, I've checked again, this article was created before the first nomination. OK, I just assumed that if it was previously nominated, then it should've been in the summary, looks like it is a wrong assumption.  Delta  space 42 (talk • contribs) 15:59, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: The name is now used by a dieting app for smartphones. This software was last updated in 2011 and doesn't seem to have been notable then, or now. Lack of any kind of sourcing, what's given now in the article is a download link/repository. Oaktree b (talk) 19:52, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: "Keep because it's informative" was the result of the last AfD, Bonkers. Oaktree b (talk) 19:53, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article fails WP:GNG, WP:NSOFT, WP:NCORP. While I can't find any specific examples, I can imagine a situation where a bundle of config scripts could be notable. However this article's subject does not appear to be notable as it fails even the most basic notability criteria. - Aoidh (talk) 03:24, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. No good place to redirect. Suitskvarts (talk) 15:18, 27 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.