Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creamfinance (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was '''Speedy deleted per G4, G11 RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:00, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Creamfinance
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Looks like it was recommended for speedy deletion in August 2016 but had the tag removed by WP:SPA prior to an admin making a speedy decision. The closest thing I can find to in-depth coverage is this from Forbes, but it is written by a contributor and not staff writer – also reads like a sponsored piece. CNMall41 (talk) 06:28, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. This was deleted in last AfD, why is this WP:CORPSPAM back? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:59, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * : - Looks like an WP:SPA removed the prod from the page in 2015 which led to the first AfD and ultimate deletion. This recreation was recommended for speedy and another SPA removed that tag. While I normally wouldn't request, I think salting would be in order as there is a definitely an issue with editors trying to skirt the deletion process. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:11, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:15, 5 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes, we don't (yet) see the independent substantive coverage and the editing around this is suspect. For all I know there might be non-newsrelease type Latvian or Polish news refs but I don't see a case for keeping. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:19, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latvia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:21, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:21, 5 March 2017 (UTC)


 * I've submitted a CSD under CSD G4, although I assume that CSD A7 would also apply here. Maybe even Spam Nicnote  •  ask me a question  •  contributions  17:50, 7 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.