Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creating public Communities


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Flowerparty ☀ 00:48, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Creating public Communities

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable website and web users' group. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:26, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:18, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

the site Creating public Communities is edited after WikiDan61s comment. the updated version has references, categories, Citing sources and more appropriate citations from reliable sources.from HjK — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hjkinfo (talk • contribs)
 * Comment But still does not assert notability per WP:WEB, WP:GROUP, or the more generic WP:N. The single reference given does not even mention the group (either by name or by acronym).  A Google search does not provide any insight into this group's existence or significance.  The inline citations that are provided are either primary sources, foreign Wikipedia articles (Wikipedia itself should NOT be considered a reliable source), or links to external sites that make little or no mention of CPC.  It should also be noted that there may be a significant conflict of interest in that the group's founder (Hjørdis Kurås) and the article's author (HJKInfo) are quite similar.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:14, 8 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete It's well intentioned, but it is simply not notable, sorry. See refs in comment immediately above. Johnuniq (talk) 04:46, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

it is WP:GROUP and thats mentioned HJK (may stand for) and google resaults 17 400 000 for cpc-(been through all the sites, i do not think So)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hjkinfo (talk • contribs) 14:40, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't think you understand the meaning of WP:GROUP. This is a Wikipedia guideline defining what notability means in terms of groups such as CpC.  It doesn't mean that EVERY group gets to have a Wikipedia page, it means that only groups meeting the criteria get to have a page.  The criteria involve reliable independent coverage in secondary sources.  This type of coverage cannot be found for CpC.  And yes, there are over 30 million hits for the term "CPC" on the English language Google, so to limit the results, I searched for "Creating public Communities", and found only two relevant hits: the organization's own website and a mention of their existence at the Atelier Nord website.  No gNews hits.  And finally, yes, HjK may stand for any number of things, but when the user named Hjkinfo edits an article about an organization run by Hjørdis Kurås, my nose twitches. That is actually beside the point, actually, as the conflict of interest is not really the problem with the article.  It is really all about notability, and lack thereof.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:03, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

@@Alan Wilkins (playwright) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search This article is about the British playwright. For other uses, see Alan Wilkins (disambiguation). This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help delete this article —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hjkinfo (talk • contribs) 14:50, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Please refrain from making irrelevant commentary about unrelated articles. Since the Alan Wilkins article was edited by me, this could be considered a personal attack.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:03, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

HjK may stand for any number of things, but when the user named Hjkinfo edits an article about an organization run by Hjørdis Kurås, my nose twitches.this is a personal threath. the cpc project exists in 40 languages, also english, and how many hits at google is not a criteria for wikipedia. it has reliable sources, and english is not only spoken in britain, both ex refernces can be translated to english —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hjkinfo (talk • contribs) 15:12, 9 June 2009 (UTC) tips: ttranslate to arabic and you will find more info —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hjkinfo (talk • contribs) 15:18, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete unless English secondary sources can be provided verifying notability (not existence). Does it even have a Norwegian WP page? Disembrangler (talk) 14:56, 9 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Sufficient citations are given for verification. It should be noted that the nominator (WikiDan61 (talk · contribs)) has had his article nominated for deletion by me, and may be nominating this article in retaliation. HJK —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.159.18.71 (talk) 11:07, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Only one vote per editor please. This anon IP editor (who conveniently signs his posts "HJK" has already voted under the id .  Please also note that this article was nominated for deletion before HJK nominated my article for deletion, so if any retaliation is taking place, it is on his part.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:03, 10 June 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.