Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creation’s Tears


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. –MuZemike 18:16, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Creation’s Tears

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

I would not normally call Afd on this, I would watch it for promotion though. But then I see it has been in AfD before Articles for deletion/Creation's tears and deleted. But I think not CSD#G4 either, I cannot see the old article and this may be a better article. So Back to AfD and see what we get. Triwbe (talk) 12:44, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  —Triwbe (talk) 12:47, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 16:28, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:08, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep The previous article was deleted as I would understand, primarily on the grounds that the band did not have any released works. The article was thus deemed to be an advert for a forthcoming release.  Creation's Tears subsequently released their debut album on 4th Oct 2010 and have had coverage in major UK press and major worldwide websites since.   17th Nov 2010  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Parody Paradigm (talk • contribs) 17:54, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * This one come done to what is in the magazines cited. Does anyone have deatilas about the coverage claimed? duffbeerforme (talk) 13:19, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep Considering the band has released an album on the label which currently publishes Slipknot, Rob Zombie and Megadeth it is unlikely that the band and the album haven't collectively received enough sourcing, very unlikely. I know little about this sort of music except that there is longstanding magazine support for it and it is probably one of those areas, like TV episodes, where a 'sourcing iceberg' exists, IE what's available online is in no way representative of sourcing available in print. Someoneanother 02:20, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.