Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creation (Exalted)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Daniel  02:56, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Creation (Exalted)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

"Let there be fancruft; and there was. And the fancruft was non-notable; and the fancruft was separated from the verifiable sources and mixed with original research" --Gavin Collins 20:03, 27 September 2007 (UTC).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletions.   --Gavin Collins 20:06, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
 * And verily I say unto thee, delete per nom. Stifle (talk) 20:31, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity of vanities, saith the Preacher, vanity of vanities; all is vanity. Sandstein 22:14, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
 * How about an uncondescending Delete for a change? Seriously, you guys are so full of your own self-righteousness it's sickening. Sure, this isn't a Wikipedia article, but why be smug about it? --Agamemnon2 06:50, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and userfy. JJL 17:43, 29 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.