Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creation and the Roman Catholic Church


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Singu larity  06:29, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Creation and the Roman Catholic Church

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Needless POV fork from Evolution and the Roman Catholic Church. Material here is already covered in that article, this one seems to exist solely to emphasise the ambiguity in the churches current support for theistic evolution. ornis ( t ) 08:03, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - per above. Onnaghar tl 11:27, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge; no need for two articles. Kablammo 12:21, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Now three articles. Articles_for_deletion/Theistic_evolution_and_the_Roman_Catholic_Church.  Kablammo 23:33, 16 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete This fork is just a mess. I fear that it will never make sense, since it confuses at least three separate different ideas, creation (origin beliefs), creationism (creatianism) and creationism (anti-evolution). This sort of disorganized forking without community consensus just leads to complete chaos.--Filll 12:51, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete The Catholic Church has nothing much to say about the topic, so how can we? This information, barely worth a couple of sentences, is covered in other articles.   Orange Marlin  Talk• Contributions 15:58, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, maybe even per WP:CSD, because the page makes no sense. Nen  yedi  • (Deeds•Talk) 16:27, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per OrangeMarlin. ¿SFGi Д nts!  ¿Complain! ¿Analyze! ¿Review! 20:34, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Yet another POV fork. I suppose, given their propensity for creating fork, no one can accuse the creationists of coming from a tree that doesn't fork much.  &#0149;Jim 62 sch&#0149;  21:25, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete should stay within the parent article Ealdgyth | Talk 17:04, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * redirect both articles aren't needed, so this should redirect to the other one.-- Sef rin gle Talk 04:08, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * comment I don't know about that, currently nothing outside of afds and the talk page of the parent article links here, and they don't seem like terribly likely search terms. ornis ( t ) 04:32, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletions.   — Sef rin gle Talk 04:08, 21 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.