Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creative Digital Agency


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:57, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Creative Digital Agency

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non notable organization that doesn’t satisfy WP:NCORP. A before search linked me to unreliable sources such as this, this & this Celestina007 (talk) 22:33, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:33, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:33, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:33, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:33, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 22:33, 23 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Only news coverage I can find is from press release republishers. Nothing I can find to establish real notability. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:00, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

1. Greenslover.net and 2. Crunchbase Both were not used in the content either.
 * Keep - I disagree with the nominator because two of the bad links cited by her  do not belong to the subject.


 * The subject has won several notable awards as seen in the following sources
 * mmaglobal.com
 * digiday.com
 * mobilemarketingmagazine.com
 * mobilemarketingmagazine.com
 * hermesawards.com
 * hermesawards.com

With the above, the subject meets the WP:NCORP and also the GNG as well. Thanks PizNNo (talk) 19:33, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Other good sources cited include
 * thedrum.com
 * techcrunch.com
 * Hermesawards.com is certainly not reliable or independent. The Techcrunch article merely says that they conducted a poll. Thedrum is a website for marketers about marketing. Mobilemarketingmagazine is a non-notable award, digiday is a nomination for a non-notable award. MMA Global is another non-notable award. Greensolver isn't even a source, they're just trying to sell services. Crunchbase is a listing of companies and professionals and does not establish notability. Basically none of this adds anything towards WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:43, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * @, all the sources you listed do not establish notability for the organization. I could do a source analysis table for you but @, already did justice to them above. Celestina007 (talk) 19:56, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * User:ScottishFinnishRadish and User:Celestina007, Thanks for the insight. However, the point I am making in one of my claims is that the "Greensolver" and "Crunchbase" links which Celestina pointed to doesn't belong to the subject. Both belong to a different firm that goes by the same name. You can see that they weren't used in the content. PizNNo (talk) 10:11, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Neither of those is a reliable source that establishes notability. One is Crunchbase is just a list of companies that you can pay to search and get information on and the Greensolver link is just selling a wordpress theme that doesn't even appear related to the company. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:53, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   19:54, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - obvious undisclosed paid-for spam. I have blocked the creator, PizNNo, for spamming. MER-C 14:50, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete this unambiguously promotional page. MarioGom (talk) 16:35, 3 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.