Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creative economy in South Korea


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  14:22, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Creative economy in South Korea

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I don't think this is notable, I know there are some citations given from third parties, but the majority are from primary government sources. The article is discussing a piece of obscure jargon at length, with numerous POV, style, prose, and sourcing issues. If this isn't deleted, it needs to be significantly cut down. toobigtokale (talk) 10:44, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Economics and South Korea. toobigtokale (talk) 10:44, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: Most of the refs are doubled or tripled (author probably didn't know citation formatting), and they don't link to anything or give titles. They are mostly written/created by the same few people. Also, prose is very essay-ish. —asparagusus   (interaction)  sprouts!  16:19, 10 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.