Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creative industry in Brazil


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. I assume the people who !voted "keep but cleanup" will actually go and do some cleaning up. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:38, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Creative industry in Brazil

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

advertising The Banner talk 23:14, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment Not to impugn the nominator's judgement, but was the edit summary of the article creator This is the translation of a PT Wikipedia article" missed?    ArcAngel    (talk) ) 00:20, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * No, this was not missed. But perhaps you have missed that user Sistema Firjan has written an article that is mainly about the company/company products of Firjan. The Banner talk 20:02, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 2 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep and rigorously cleanup - I see no validity in the deletion rationale of 'advertising' which can be resolved by rigorous editorial action. It is certainly a poor article but the subject is clearly notable and there are a whole bunch of supporting sources and more are available. The fact that the creator may have a COI is a matter for cleanup and for closely examining the content, and the other apparently promotional article that he created is being separately considered. When we have a clearly encyclopaedic concept, we should be cleaning and improving (or perhaps robustly stubbing), not deleting. The Whispering Wind (talk) 22:47, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep WP:COI is a serious problem, but not a valid reason for deletion. Vanamonde93 (talk) 12:46, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I know that but the nomination is for advertising, not COI. The Banner talk 20:40, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.