Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creative peacebuilding (visual arts)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 02:50, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Creative peacebuilding (visual arts)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This is not a notable concept. It's someone's personal essay. Thenightaway (talk) 18:16, 27 September 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:35, 5 October 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:17, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:44, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect along with similarly named Creative peacebuilding to Peace. Per nom, no indication of notability as anything other than an obscure theory of peace. TimTempleton (talk) (cont)  19:13, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: Considering this particular article, as was said above and in a longstanding tag on the article itself, it reads like someone's personal essay, with sections of general description and references. I am not seeing evidence that this topic is specifically notable. (Regarding the suggestion of a partial merge to Peace, I don't see the substantial content here whch would be needed and feel any merge would produce an undue imbalance in the target article.) AllyD (talk) 12:52, 12 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.