Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creatorragia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy deleted by Deville under CSD G7. GRBerry 03:51, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Creatorragia

 * — (View AfD)

Externally unverified neologism. Originally prodded, because I can't find any secondary sources for this term from a brief Google search of this word, although I find a domain name and an email address among the 8 unique/33 total hits.

The prod was removed with the hidden comment that "Although being a neologism, there is a movement that's growing and real. It shouldn't be a long time before the name becomes spread and therefore reffered to more often. It is not taken out of the blue, that is for sure. Therefore, please, there shouldn't be the need to delete it. Thank you for your consideration".

Unfortunately, I believe that until the term is talked about in externally verifiable, third party fact-checked reliable sources,the article is original research and should be deleted -- saberwyn 22:55, 11 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Strong delete: With so few google hits, it is clear that this is a completely non-notable term. If for some reason it does become common someday, as the deprodder suggests, we can have an article about it then. Heimstern Läufer 23:36, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Heimstern. Fails WP:NEO --Steve (Slf67)talk 00:23, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete per Heimstern Laufer. Danny Lilithborne 05:46, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.