Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creature (Pop Smoke song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Shoot for the Stars, Aim for the Moon. (non-admin closure) ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 14:20, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Creature (Pop Smoke song)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails to meet WP: NSongs. Only presents one good source, Hot New Hip Hop. Times of India only mentions the video and cites the lyrics of the song. Entering charts doesn't mean a song is notable. The rest of the article is composed of album reviews and "self-interested parties" such as a manager and producers MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 11:25, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 11:25, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 11:25, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. EpicPupper 18:28, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to Shoot for the Stars, Aim for the Moon: the song not only has a lack of independent sources, but there was no music video or other promotional material plus Canadian Hot 100 is the only top 50 position. --K. Peake 17:02, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
 * WP:SNOW close due to being the same nonsensical nomination MarioSoulTruthFan has made to other song articles recently, which I have explained in his other Afds why they're nonsense. Speaking of which, he tried to do something similar with an article on a One Direction as notable as this one, and got his ass handed to him on a platter for a good reason. XD 👨x🐱 (talk) 22:21, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Alright, that wasn't cool. I'll be WP:CIVIL. Weak Keep. I understand a lot of the sources used are currently about the album and not the song itself, and it's generally encouraged to have pieces mainly about the topic to establish independent notability. I also know that WP:NSONGS states charts don't guarantee notability. For me, I think it's more about whether the sources used (even if not about the song itself) could be used to create full, non-stub article and if there's anything, including charts and awards, to give it independent notability. I admit to trying to WP:BLUDGEON the point in these Afds into MarioSoul, and I absolutely apologize for it. I'll WP:DROPTHESTICK about all of this, because it's only been getting me mad plus I do have more important things to focus on than getting into a WP:BATTLE over articles I've never worked on. 👨x🐱 (talk) 00:28, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  03:38, 28 April 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:59, 5 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Redirect as per Kyle Peake. I can't see much to show that the song is notable individually. ƒirefly  ( t · c ) 12:30, 6 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.