Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creature entertainment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 19:40, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Creature entertainment

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poorly referenced article. I dream of horses (T) @ 22:36, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  22:44, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  22:44, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:37, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:37, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:37, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:37, 27 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Weak delete: I haven't turned up significant coverage in reliable sources to meet WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. There are a couple of interviews but they're not good for notability and other than that it's directory listings and passing mentions in local media. BethNaught (talk) 06:45, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 07:01, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:20, 11 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete, reluctantly. But as BethNaught said, the sources in the article are clearly insufficient to meet the WP:GNG or otherwise establish notability, and I failed to find any better ones via google.  If they continue to work and grow in popularity their time will come, possibly soon, but it is pretty clearly not yet.  Eluchil404 (talk) 23:33, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.