Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creature type (Dungeons & Dragons)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Neither "keep" mentions any reliable sources. No sources, no article.  Sandstein  13:45, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Creature type (Dungeons & Dragons)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is sourced only by primary sources. It also seems more like a game guide than an encyclopedic article. Not a very active user (talk) 17:18, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 17:18, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 17:18, 24 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep, but move to Creature type (there is no need for disambiguation), and expand to cover the concept of creature types as employed in other gaming systems. bd2412  T 17:23, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * bd2412, do you have any sources to show that this is a notable topic? When I do a web search, I mostly get RPG source books, which are neither reliable nor independent. Rockphed (talk) 17:38, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I am finding it more difficult to pinpoint sources than I would have expected. Nevertheless, typology of monsters is a ubiquitous characteristic of role-playing games. Perhaps the solution is to find a more appropriate term to head this under. bd2412  T 19:28, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:37, 25 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep Oranjelo100 (talk) 23:20, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. The article is nothing but a primary-sourced game guide.  As mentioned by both the nomination and BD2412, sources on this topic showing notability are not readily available.  A properly sourced article, potentially under a more accurate title, on a similar concept in general, as proposed by bd2412 has merit, but doing so does not require the retention of this primary sourced game guide.  Rorshacma (talk) 22:34, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per Rorshacma and nom.4meter4 (talk) 18:25, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete pure WP:GAMEGUIDE content.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 20:57, 1 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.