Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creatures of Kyralia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. However, if anyone would like it userfied in order to improve this, drop me a line. Fabrictramp |  talk to me  02:11, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Creatures of Kyralia

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This trivial list of fictional elements does not establish notability independent of Age of the Five through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. TTN (talk) 03:25, 6 December 2008 (UTC) 
 * Keep or merge into an article on the fictional universe. We ned to try to get some decent general article out of these --as explained in detail above. Just deleting is not constructive. DGG (talk) 08:09, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not establish notability through significant coverage of real world context in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject. Merging will not result in real world context, so that doesn't solve the problem. Jay32183 (talk) 23:02, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as unnotable. Eusebeus (talk) 00:02, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:17, 11 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete- as Jay32183 says, merging will not address the fact that this list staggeringly fails to demonstrate any real-world notability. Including this stuff anywhere would be a gross example of putting undue weight on extremely minor aspects of a fictional work. Reyk  YO!  03:50, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Real world notability isn't everything, something could be notable within the fictional world and still not be real world notable. - Mgm|(talk) 08:47, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Both real-world impact and importance within the fictional world are generally necessary. Reyk  YO!  19:52, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete This describes a minor part of a world for which we don't have an article. So it's not a split off of some larger piece that can be merged back. Not verified and unlikely to be verifiable with independent sources (verifying with dependent sources is only acceptable to some degree in context of a larger piece of writing) - Mgm|(talk) 08:47, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I moved/ "merged" (I don't understand the history merge process very well) the information over to the Age of the Five article. If I acted improperly, please delete, revert, expunge, and slap me with whatever notices, warnings, and penalties appropriate. Gracias. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:20, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * weak Keep and improve. List like this have potential to be good breakout articles.  This one isn't there yet. Hobit (talk) 15:16, 14 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.