Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Credit Union Deposit Insurance Corporation (Prince Edward Island)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There was some discussion about merging some of the material, but there still was no meaningful assertion of notability. I will be happy to userfy information here if someone wishes to attempt a different article. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  20:46, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Credit Union Deposit Insurance Corporation (Prince Edward Island)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence at all of notability. The Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation is notable, but not the provinces.  DGG ( talk ) 00:19, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I am also nominating the following related pages for all the other provincial deposit insurance companies for the same reason:
 *  DGG ( talk ) 01:05, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 *  DGG ( talk ) 01:05, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 *  DGG ( talk ) 01:05, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 *  DGG ( talk ) 01:05, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 *  DGG ( talk ) 01:05, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 *  DGG ( talk ) 01:05, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 *  DGG ( talk ) 01:05, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 *  DGG ( talk ) 01:05, 3 July 2015 (UTC)


 * KEEP Provincial CROWN corporations. Me-123567-Me (talk) 00:23, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:50, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:50, 3 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete all. Simply being a Crown Corp doesn't make something notable. Looking over the Alberta corp, for instance, I am seeing nothing in the way of non-trivial coverage of the subject. Resolute 01:16, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete all - This is kind of like how some bands are notable, but not all members are independently notable, if that analogy works for you. Policy isn't written so that all Crown Corporations are considered to be automatically notable, thus they need to demonstrate individual notability, per WP:CORP.  These don't. Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 12:45, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - Perhaps as a compromise they could all be put into one list? Me-123567-Me (talk) 17:12, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. They serve an educational purpose for those wanting to learn about financial systems in Canada. Converting them to redirects in a list is also possible. + m t  21:12, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * A merged article about the concept, with each of these remaining in place as redirects to it, might be appropriate — but as much as "education" may factor into Wikipedia's mandate, the topics are not so critically important that the desire to educate readers about financial systems, or Crown corporations, in Canada can constitute a valid exemption from Wikipedia's content policies about verifiability in reliable sources. With the exception of one newspaper citation in the Manitoba corporation's article, all of these are either entirely unsourced, or resting solely on a single primary source, which means none of them have been properly demonstrated to pass either WP:CORP or WP:GNG. Delete or merge into a common list. Bearcat (talk) 18:08, 9 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.