Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creditary economics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. PeaceNT 08:38, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Creditary economics

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

As I suspected, a search in the OED came up with nothing. In any case, the current article is little more than spam and a dictionary definition. (WP:SPAM, WP:NOT, WP:NEO)) nadav (talk) 13:35, 25 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment: I just speedied Christopher Meakin, which was related to this subject. Just wanted to mention it in case anyone would be interested. Bjelleklang -  talk  Bug Me  14:56, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Fang Aili talk 16:00, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete --Gregalton 22:39, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete a definition of the adjective would not suffice when the type of noun is at issue. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 01:53, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:WINAD, among others. Stifle (talk) 13:49, 26 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.