Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Credo (The Human League album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. While the consensus is certainly not unanimous, it is quite clear. Those arguing to delete point to a lack of reliable sources confirming the details of the album. Some links have been put forward in this AfD (as yet, the article is still sourced entirely to an online forum) but it has not been established that those links constitute reliable sources for the purposes of the relevant notability and inclusion standards. Mkativerata (talk) 20:54, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Credo (The Human League album)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

WP:CRYSTAL —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:22, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete way too soon. Fanboys are so impatient... Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 20:39, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom EnDaLeCoMpLeX (contributions) • (let's chat) 21:00, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Name of album confirmed by numerous separate sources: the band's manager Simon Watson in an interview dated 20 Sep 2010 The name of the album is ‘Credo’ but it will now not be released until next year I’m afraid, as well as the OFFICIAL flyers and press ads for the band's forthcoming tour LINK. What more proof could anyone need? StrodoDoggins (talk) 21:58, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note to admins - User:StrodoDoggins is the creator of the article.  Nowyouseeme talk2me  23:41, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Response See WP:HAMMER —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:49, 28 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - overwhelming past outcomes practically make WP:HAMMER a policy, if not a common law doctrine. This is where I agree with the man with the otters.  Proof must be in major, independent, reliable sources, although FWIW I would include the more reliable online music blogs. Bearian (talk) 23:19, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:33, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:HAMMERTIME  Nowyouseeme talk2me  23:41, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
 * WP:HAMMER doesn't apply, not least because we know what the tracklisting is Confirmed here and, oh look, here it is being mastered in the studio Are you people Birthers too? StrodoDoggins (talk) 00:56, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - article clearly needs "fleshing out" but title and tracklisting each substantiated by several reliable sources, so appears to satisfy minimum requirement of WP:NALBUMS. The zealots are out in force on this one. 62.25.109.196 (talk) 09:31, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - From WP:CRYSTAL "All articles about anticipated events must be verifiable, and the subject matter must be of sufficiently wide interest that it would merit an article if the event had already occurred." The current reference in the article is a forum. Shouldn't be too difficult to edit in a more reliable source, should it? --Kvng (talk) 14:43, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: Notable and reliable sources. - Ret.Prof (talk) 03:01, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.