Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Credorax


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:17, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Credorax

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don think cited sources are RS, but i could be wrong. Saqib (talk) 07:19, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 08:14, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:29, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete No indications of notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP, references fail the criteria for establishing notability, WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing ++ 17:15, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as the expected public relations the company is responsible for, but there's no signs of the necessary improvements therefore we delete it under one of the several applying criteria. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 22:06, 7 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.