Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creedence Cover The Classics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. JForget 02:45, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Creedence Cover The Classics

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable recent compilation album by notable band; PROD declined and invited to take to AfD. No references, no hint of an assertion of notability, nothing. Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  05:00, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Album is actually titled "Creedence Clearwater Revival Covers the Classics." I cited a review from Allmusic. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:08, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * comment - thanks for the help, Hammer; still doesn't qualify as substantial coverage in my book. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  18:10, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Another review found, behind a paywall. The label seems notable, and Erlewine was arsed enough to review it. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:23, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep- I'd say the Allmusic review is enough to make it notable. RG (talk) 20:51, 27 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep - I agree with the above votes. Probably a quickie compilation tossed off by a record company with little use for fans and collectors, but the reviews and the obvious notability of the band show that the article isn't really hurting anything by being here. D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 03:07, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Passes WP:NALBUMS as an officially released album by a notable artist that has been reviewed, providing content for an article. Rlendog (talk) 01:20, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.