Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creekside Elementary School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 08:06, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Creekside Elementary School

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Speedy delete as empty. No attempt to assert notability. If kept, this space needs to be a dab page and the article content moved. Vegaswikian 07:34, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - pretty obviously nn. I wouldn't recommend keeping the space, either, as I find it unlikely that any Creekside Elementary School clears the notability bar.  --Hyperbole 07:37, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Doesn't seem to be empty any more. GlassCobra 08:31, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not empty, but still not notable. Lordjeff06 10:40, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable, not very much content. -- θnce θn this island Speak! 17:17, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete.... this belongs as a note on the page of School District 36 Surrey, which it is. No other notability, just like all the other schools on there that someone decided needed to have their own pages for no reason. Epthorn 18:44, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Speaking of which, does anyone know of a tool one can use to make the deletion process a little quicker? There are a number of similar schools on that page, School District 36 Surrey, and all of them are exactly like this article- lacking in notability and substance.Epthorn 18:52, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I tried to delete several schools under WP:CSD A7 but one administrator declined. Schools have been deleted at CSD in the past. So that is the easier way. However it depends on the administrator who sees the request. They can choose to delete, remove the tag, change it to a merge, skip over the request for someone else to look at, send it to prod or any number of other options. Generally if there are only one or two, merging is a good choice leaving the name as a redirect. However in this case the was a template pointing here which probably needs to also be deleted after the red links appear. And no, it is not the one for the BC schools it is another, that's the reason to the DAB page comment. Is there a BC template that may also need looking into? Vegaswikian 19:18, 4 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete No assertion of notability so it fails WP:N, article is just 1 sentence (stating where the school is at). Make a note on the article for the school district. TJ Spyke 19:38, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions.   —Noroton 15:15, 7 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.