Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creepy treehouse


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 04:51, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Creepy treehouse

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Wikipedia is not a dictionary ComputerUserUser (talk) 22:53, 8 March 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:59, 15 March 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:40, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2024 March 8.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 23:05, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:27, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Education.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  00:36, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Most Wikipedia articles begin with a definition. That does not make them dictionary content if they go on to discuss the topic as such rather than the word that names the article. That seems to be the case here. Although the lead section and one source offer definitions, the other sources and some of the current content discuss the educational issue. (My !vote is weak because I don't know about the issue. The sources do seem to establish notability, though.) Cnilep (talk) 02:44, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per above and also per this section of the Wikipedia is not a dictionary policy. I've indefblocked the nominator for incompetence and general inflexibility (the latter shown by the nomination statement here). Graham87 (talk) 03:21, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Weak keep per above. Could be a better article, but it's already more than just a WP:DICTDEF. Brusquedandelion (talk) 04:15, 23 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.