Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creighton the Cretin (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete per CSD:G4. Stifle (talk) 10:49, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Creighton the Cretin
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unremarkable comic. No wanting to start an edit war here, so here's the afd. LAA Fan sign review 01:14, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - What exactly does unremarkable mean? This seems a lot like WP:IDONTLIKEIT. If this is your only reason for deletion, then I must say this a not a very good AfD nomination. Also, where did your comment on edit warring come from? If you are talking about when I removed the PROD, then per WP:Proposed deletion, you aren't allowed to add it back anyways. In any case, although I might support your notion that the article should be deleted (it is incredibly in-universe with no reliable sources to indicate notability), your nomination statement of "Unremarkable comic." has much to be desired. Artichoker [ talk ]  01:23, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, let me clarify, because I usually don't write a very detailed AFD. The edit warring was I didn't want to edit war with you over the deletion, no matter what type; I try to avoid that. I nominated because this an unremarkable "comic". The comic is from a fictional book. There are no real references. At the most, it should be merged with the book.-- LAA Fan sign review 02:37, 10 October 2008 (UTC)


 * very weak delete hard to tell. What's with that references section?  Thin  boy  00  @104, i.e. 01:29, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete appears to have been deleted by AfD consensus just a couple weeks ago. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  01:50, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.   -- &mdash; G716  &lt;T·C&gt; 01:58, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete (G4) — Recreation of material deleted per AfD. I don't know what else is there to explain here. Creator should've went to DRV first instead of recreating the article. MuZemike  ( talk ) 02:07, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - As G4, recreation of material deleted via a deletion discussion. So tagged.  TN ‑  X   - Man  02:41, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - As I said last time: "this is about a fictional cartoon created by a fictional cartoon character in a work of cartoon fiction! While the book it appears in has won awards, surely notability can't be inherited that far?" Re-creating the article in the same form with no evidence doesn't help the case for notability. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 07:40, 10 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.