Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creole (markup)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. —Wknight94 (talk) 18:21, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Creole (markup)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Little known effort to produce a standardised form of wikitext, no 3rd party sources cited. The only thing of interest that Google turns up is an ACM paper, but it was written by the WikiCreole designers themselves so hardly counts as a "reliable 3rd party source." Apart from that, almost all the hits returned by a Google search seem to be in blogs, issue trackers and similar. Vquex (talk) 16:24, 8 June 2008 (UTC)


 * 1) Delete per Vquex's argument. In addition, having to freeze development for two years until the thing is adopted hardly promotes the idea that it's an important markup language. Ironholds 06:11, 12 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.