Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crest Capital (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  23:57, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Crest Capital
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable company, sourcing used is flowery and the awards won are non-notable. No sourcing found beyond confirmation of existence. Oaktree b (talk) 20:07, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Oaktree b (talk) 20:07, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Georgia (U.S. state).  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:26, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: There's not been a lot of improvement since the restored soft-deletion outcome of the first AfD, and the late DGG's deletion rationale still appears strong. Beyond that, they have an updated product assessment from Business News Daily / business.com and a June 2023 "Best Equipment Financing Companies" assessment from Investopedia, but I don't see these as sufficient to demonstrate notability. AllyD (talk) 14:55, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NCORP, WP:SIRS. References are very poor for what is a brochure article.   scope_creep Talk  16:42, 8 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete - refs are inadequate for notability.
 * -- A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 18:52, 8 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.