Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CricketWatchdogs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 03:37, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

CricketWatchdogs

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is about a non-notable website. Searches don't reveal any meaningful information, and I struggle to see if the website even exists any more as described in this article.  Harrias  talk 23:19, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:56, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:56, 23 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Per nom. Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 18:36, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:02, 29 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete A non-notable forum. &mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  07:54, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. Zia Khan 06:58, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.